Migration to version 16.0

[OCA-git-bot]

Todo

https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-16.0

Modules to migrate

• base_external_dbsource - By @anddago78 - [16.0][MIG]base_external_dbsource #208
• base_external_dbsource_mssql - By @anddago78 - [16.0][MIG] base_external_dbsource_mssql #210
• base_external_dbsource_sqlite - By @anddago78 - [16.0][MIG] base_external_dbsource_sqlite #209
• base_external_system - By @ntsirintanis - [16.0][MIG] base_external_system: Migration to 16.0. #204
• base_global_discount - By @ferran-S73 - [16.0][MIG] base_global_discount: 16.0 #202
• base_import_match - By @bvanjeelharia - [16.0][MIG] base_import_match: Migration to 16.0 #207
• base_user_role - By @apineux - [16.0][MIG] base_user_role: Migrate to version 16.0 #185
• base_user_role_company - By @Urvisha-OSI - [16.0][MIG] base_user_role_company #211
• base_user_role_history - By @apineux - [MIG] base_user_role_history: Migration to 16.0 #186
• server_action_navigate - By @legalsylvain - [16.0] mig server_action_navigate (from 14.0) #258
• server_action_sort - By @legalsylvain - [ADD] server_action_sort : module to mass sort items (One2many) of any models, by any criterias #259

Missing module? Check https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/%5BFAQ%5D-Missing-modules-in-migration-issue-list

[ferran-S73]

base_global_discount #202

[flotho]

Hi,
Is it normal that base_davdoesn't appear in any of the migration issues since the v11? any feedback @fkantelberg

Regards

[fkantelberg]

@flotho I guess this sums it up. The module arrived later to the branch than the migration list.

[flotho]

thanks @fkantelberg but actually no try to migrate have been done since v11 nor listing the module in the migratoin issue.
So I'm wondering if there is any plan or need for this feature, or eventually if there is an alternative in the main ocre of Odoo ?
regards

[fkantelberg]

There were 2 tries to migrate towards 12.0 (#226 and #141) but both attempts got stale/not finished. I did the initial push for a customer but the feature wasn't requested afterwards again. I'm currently not aware of a core function similar to it. It's just a timing issue that it wasn't in the list intially and it continued over the versions because of the lack of engagement