Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: OPSEC Threat Modeling #861

Open
PowerPress opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request: OPSEC Threat Modeling #861

PowerPress opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request version-3.x

Comments

@PowerPress
Copy link

Describe what problem your feature request solves:
There is no OPSEC based threat modeling unless its in context SDLC

Describe the solution you'd like:
I would like an option to use Threat-Dragon to create OPSEC or Operation Security based threat model

Additional context:
Most threat models are defined in terms of software developers life cycle or IT. OPSEC applies to IT and all domains especially physical. I could find no OPSEC threat models and think this could easily be added to Threat-Dragon and increase the user baser. The ability to easily create OPSEC threat models and display them especially for the physical domain has a lot of value. See an good example here: https://old.reddit.com/r/opsec/comments/eh6uvc/want_to_learn_opsec_as_a_total_beginner_start_here/

@PowerPress PowerPress added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 7, 2024
@jgadsden
Copy link
Collaborator

jgadsden commented Feb 8, 2024

yes, certainly sounds interesting - can you take this on @PowerPress ?
I will assign it to you, but please decline it if you do not have the time to do it

@PowerPress
Copy link
Author

I apologize I will have to decline the assignment

I'm not sure how to officially decline it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request version-3.x
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants