-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HttpOnly needs updates #314
Comments
After taking a look at the documentation one more suggestion. Should the examples be rewritten because now applications dont use servlets anymore. Also we are on Java 11 and .Net 3.5. |
The whole thing can be re-written. The content should simply be written with modern details and cover the three or four currently relevant browsers (Chrome (Edge Chrome), Firefox, Safari, Edge). |
I will try to create smaller PRs in chunks instead of making changes in the whole page in one in one PR. |
Great! |
@rangira got something ready yet? |
1 similar comment
@rangira got something ready yet? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@kingthorin Can you please suggest me, from where should I fetch the latest data? |
Well you could start by dumping content related to browsers that are gone (IE) or barely used (Opera). The other details you might have to research or test manually. If needed/wanted you can get Windows Development VMs here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/downloads/virtual-machines/ |
I want to work on this issue. please assign me this issue. |
I just finished dealing with
auto-migrated
issues for this article, it could definitely use some content updates:https://github.com/OWASP/www-community/blob/master/pages/HttpOnly.md it still talks about old versions of IE and Opera.
This article includes an extensive table that needs re-working after the auto-migration as well (which I did not tackle).
Is Opera even relevant in 2020? Do we still care about IE with Edge/Edge Chrome?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: