You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I believe this work is a great contribution to the material science.
When I use a different pretrained model to draw the potential energy following the same procedure as you provided in embedding.ipynb, I got a totally different result.
The energy is only -1.4 eV. I am confused why could this happen, because I used the Gemnet all for OC20. it should get the similar result compared to the providing result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is hard to say what the reason is since you don't say what model you used. The different models are for different tasks, and sometimes give adsorption energy and sometimes give total energy.
Hello, I believe this work is a great contribution to the material science.
When I use a different pretrained model to draw the potential energy following the same procedure as you provided in embedding.ipynb, I got a totally different result.
The energy is only -1.4 eV. I am confused why could this happen, because I used the Gemnet all for OC20. it should get the similar result compared to the providing result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: