Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a c++ trace file reader/writer #1

Open
TimmRuppert opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2
Open

Add a c++ trace file reader/writer #1

TimmRuppert opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2
Assignees

Comments

@TimmRuppert
Copy link
Collaborator

TimmRuppert commented Oct 18, 2024

As discussed this repo should contain a writer/reader etc. for trace files (including .mcap). Here are some loose requirements I put together based and previous discussions. Please feel free to challenge something or request to add your requirements.

Requirements (WIP)

  • File Format Support:

    • Should support .osi, .txth, and the upcoming .mcap, aiming for transparent integration for the user—if feasible.
    • Note that only .mcap allows index-based operations, multiple top-level messages, etc., so careful consideration is needed for handling these differences.
  • Future Python Compatibility:

    • Design the interface with the possibility of supporting a Python version in the future.
  • Basic CI/Test Setup:

    • Implement a minimal Continuous Integration and test setup for the repository.
  • Basic Documentation/Guide:

    • Create an initial tutorial or usage guide. This should cover basic usage and setup.
    • More comprehensive documentation should be addressed in a separate issue to avoid overloading the PR and discussions.
  • Library and Examples:

    • Provide the functionality as a library along with a few practical examples.
  • OSI Integration:

    • If time permits, explore a user-friendly way to integrate the OSI (main repository) both statically and dynamically, considering time constraints for the initial setup. For a PoC/WiP it might be enough to link statically
@TimmRuppert TimmRuppert self-assigned this Oct 18, 2024
@TimmRuppert TimmRuppert linked a pull request Nov 14, 2024 that will close this issue
16 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant