Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Move References Consistent throughout App #131

Open
darkgrue opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Make Move References Consistent throughout App #131

darkgrue opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@darkgrue
Copy link
Contributor

Currently move references are different between the app Move List interface, and the Gear Gestures. The Move List uses the long, descriptive names (e.g. "Fast Wag"); however, the Gear Gestures use the short terminal command names (e.g. "TAIILFA"). For consistency/clarity, commands should be named consistently throughout the app UI.

@MasterTailer
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed, and we should go full human I think, like "Fast Wag"

@MasterTailer
Copy link
Collaborator

Actually Ive just had a play - it uses the full names to select the moves in gestures, it just "reveals" the underlying codename once selected (sitting in the grey box) - it would be nice to show the human name, but perhaps some might like to know the underlying command?

@darkgrue
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually Ive just had a play - it uses the full names to select the moves in gestures, it just "reveals" the underlying codename once selected (sitting in the grey box) - it would be nice to show the human name, but perhaps some might like to know the underlying command?

That would be in the Wiki in the document covering the tail protocol which does match the terminal command names to the long descriptive names (unless I goofed somewhere). I don't know that end users would need to know that info otherwise (if they weren't using the terminal line). Changing the labels from the time they're selected to display is probably a bad UI pattern tho.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants