You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, We would like to have a possibility mapping existing PagerDuty Services and Backstage Groups (as shown in the screenshot) as we don't have on PagerDuty like Teams which we can map some component on BS to it !
We only use PagerDuty services to differentiate our teams at the moment. But even mapping to Backstage Groups is not available at the moment as a feature on this really cool plugin ... Kudos to you! 🙌
So from what I see only Backstage entities are available to select when mapping but not Backstage groups which in some cases make sense to be used if we want to map the PagerDuty service to some team and not individuals.
A small observation, Is it something that if changed like "kind" would work out of the box ?
// GET /mapping/entity
router.get('/mapping/entity', async (_, response) => {
try {
// Get all the entity mappings from the database
const entityMappings = await store.getAllEntityMappings();
// Get all the entities from the catalog
const componentEntities = await catalogApi!.getEntities({
filter: {
kind: 'Component',
}
});
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, We would like to have a possibility mapping existing PagerDuty Services and Backstage Groups (as shown in the screenshot) as we don't have on PagerDuty like Teams which we can map some component on BS to it !
We only use PagerDuty services to differentiate our teams at the moment. But even mapping to Backstage Groups is not available at the moment as a feature on this really cool plugin ... Kudos to you! 🙌
So from what I see only Backstage entities are available to select when mapping but not Backstage groups which in some cases make sense to be used if we want to map the PagerDuty service to some team and not individuals.
A small observation, Is it something that if changed like "kind" would work out of the box ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: