Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.20.2] Incorrect recipes, and inconsistent shape format #797

Open
ratquaza opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[1.20.2] Incorrect recipes, and inconsistent shape format #797

ratquaza opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ratquaza
Copy link

Noticed that the crafting table recipe is wrong - describes it as an L shape instead of a square:

    {
      "inShape": [
        [ 23, 23, 23 ], 
        [ 23, null, null ]
      ],
      "result": {
        "id": 278,
        "count": 1
      }
    }

Haven't found any other incorrect recipes, but there may be more.

Secondly, there's an inconsistency with the format of recipe shapes - some recipes define each array as a "row" in the crafting grid, e.g Sandstone Wall:

      "inShape": [
        [ 169, 169, 169 ],
        [ 169, 169, 169 ]
      ]

image

But then for a Redstone Torch, each array is a "column":

      "inShape": [
        [
          635,
          807,
          null
        ]
      ]

image

@wgaylord
Copy link
Contributor

This should be fixed by the same fix that fixed #804 But I will double check these recipes

@wgaylord
Copy link
Contributor

wgaylord commented Dec 27, 2023

Can confirm that this is now fixed.

Crafting table's recipe is

"278": [
{
"inShape": [
[
23,
23
],
[
23,
23
]
],
"result": {
"id": 278,
"count": 1
}
}
]

Sandstone Wall's recipe is

"387": [
{
"inShape": [
[
169,
169,
169
],
[
169,
169,
169
]
],
"result": {
"id": 387,
"count": 6
}
}
]

And the redstone torch recipe is

[
{
"inShape": [
[
635
],
[
807
]
],
"result": {
"id": 636,
"count": 1
}
}
]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants