You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Prisma Client Python lacks native support for a @Transactional decorator, which is a common and useful feature in many ORMs and database libraries. This forces developers to manually manage transactions, leading to verbose code and potential errors in transaction management.
Key issues:
Lack of a clean, declarative way to define transactional boundaries at the service level.
Difficulty in ensuring that all database operations within a method are executed within a single transaction.
Increased boilerplate code for managing transactions manually.
Potential for inconsistent transaction management across different parts of an application.
Suggested solution
Implement a native @Transactional decorator in Prisma Client Python. This decorator would:
Automatically start a transaction before the decorated method is executed, which wraps self.db.tx()
Commit the transaction if the method completes successfully.
Rollback the transaction if an exception occurs during method execution.
This implementation would handle all the transaction management internally, simplifying the developer's code and reducing the chances of transaction-related bugs.
Alternatives
Continue with manual transaction management using async with prisma.tx() as tx:.
Implement a custom decorator at the application level (current workaround for many developers, refering to here)
Use a third-party library for transaction management, although this may not integrate as seamlessly with Prisma.
Additional context
This feature is commonly available in other ORMs and database libraries, such as SQLAlchemy for Spring's @Transactional for Java. Adding this to Prisma Client Python would bring it more in line with developer expectations and best practices in database interaction patterns.
The implementation could potentially leverage Prisma's existing transaction capabilities, wrapping them in a more developer-friendly interface. It would be particularly useful in applications following a service-layer architecture, where transactional boundaries often align with service method boundaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
Currently, Prisma Client Python lacks native support for a
@Transactional
decorator, which is a common and useful feature in many ORMs and database libraries. This forces developers to manually manage transactions, leading to verbose code and potential errors in transaction management.Key issues:
Suggested solution
Implement a native
@Transactional
decorator in Prisma Client Python. This decorator would:self.db.tx()
Example usage:
This implementation would handle all the transaction management internally, simplifying the developer's code and reducing the chances of transaction-related bugs.
Alternatives
async with prisma.tx() as tx:
.Additional context
This feature is commonly available in other ORMs and database libraries, such as SQLAlchemy for Spring's
@Transactional
for Java. Adding this to Prisma Client Python would bring it more in line with developer expectations and best practices in database interaction patterns.The implementation could potentially leverage Prisma's existing transaction capabilities, wrapping them in a more developer-friendly interface. It would be particularly useful in applications following a service-layer architecture, where transactional boundaries often align with service method boundaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: