-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature signing and verifying? #67
Comments
You can call it "in progress" however work in this repo has largely stalled |
Ah thanks. Just curious... It seems like almost all JOSE libraries have stalled in their development. Is there a larger reason for this? I've heard of some security flaws in the protocol. Are there alternatives we should be considering? |
In the case of this repo I think the original contributors simply lost interest. For signatures you can just sign data directly without involving some other protocol. X.509 SPKI provides a widely-used public key format which is supported by all of our crates. |
Interest, no. Resources, yes. |
Ok thanks. I'm storing keys in a larger data structure that can be formatted as JSON, hence my interest in JWK. I suppose I could do away with any JWS formatting and just encode the signature directly as base64 or similar... |
@wellcaffeinated all of the signature algorithm implementations we maintain have |
I am interested in further developing this library because RFC 8995 extensions need it. How would I go on about to contribute? |
@juliankrieger perhaps sketch out what you have in mind here, and then open a PR which implements it |
Hi I like how this library is organized, but I'm struggling to find a way to do the following:
Is this library capable of doing this yet? Or is it still in progress?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: