You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Want to change the BNB bunch structure in our BNB generator to 18.936 ns following MicroBooNE's paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02076 and the ICARUS studies which agree with this. There is a corresponding SBND PR here that makes this change: SBNSoftware/sbndcode#419
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree @PetrilloAtWork. The only reason I didn't say that was I wasn't sure how we wanted to handle that moving forward. We can think to use this as a test case for the idea of moving common SBND/ICARUS fcl parameters to sbncode if we think that is a good idea.
jzettle
changed the title
Adjust BNB bunch timing to agree with MicroBooNE and ICARUS measurements
Check GENIE interaction time and adjust BNB bunch timing to agree with other measurements
Feb 28, 2024
I have added the idea to confirm the GENIE interaction time works as we expect. From looking at a test sample I made recently we thought further checking was needed as we did not see the correlation between position and time that we expected
Want to change the BNB bunch structure in our BNB generator to 18.936 ns following MicroBooNE's paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02076 and the ICARUS studies which agree with this. There is a corresponding SBND PR here that makes this change: SBNSoftware/sbndcode#419
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: