Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Storing enumerated values as UOctet fields is not precisely described #259

Open
dmarszk opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Storing enumerated values as UOctet fields is not precisely described #259

dmarszk opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@dmarszk
Copy link

dmarszk commented Nov 9, 2017 •
edited
Loading

UOctet fields like

MC::Parameter::ParameterValue::validityState
MC::Aggregation::AggregationDefinitionDetails::category
MC::Action::ActionDefinitionDetails::category

are meant to represent either a standard enumeration value or a deployment specific extension value. But enumeration representation as a number is encoding-specific. The field description should cover that encoding (e.g. "enumeration shall be encoded as an ordinal - a sequential counter starting at zero for the first enumeration element")

Related: esa/CCSDS_MO_StubGenerator#22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dmarszk