Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

performance issue #1272

Open
lethalwp opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

performance issue #1272

lethalwp opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@lethalwp
Copy link

Hello,

I have a big performance issue like #1077
Tried to up the RAM, postgres buffers, couldn't find anything working.

This performance problem happens when, as it is in our network:
split a xx.0.0.0/8 in 2000 /24 subnets

When i then "open" the scope in the webinterface, it is a unusable waittime.

this is the faulty query :
nipap=> SELECT pid, age(clock_timestamp(), query_start), usename, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE query != '' AND query NOT ILIKE '%pg_stat_activity%'
ORDER BY query_start desc;
pid | age | usename | query
-------+-----------------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
21579 | | |
21581 | | postgres |
21577 | | |
21576 | | |
21578 | | |
21583 | 00:00:01.958938 | nipap | +
| | | SELECT +
| | | id, +
| | | vrf_id, +
| | | vrf_rt, +
| | | vrf_name, +
| | | family, +
| | | display, +
| | | match, +
| | | prefix, +
| | | prefix_length, +
| | | display_prefix::text AS display_prefix, +
| | | description, +
| | | comment, +
| | | inherited_tags, +
| | | tags, +
| | | node, +
| | | pool_id, +
| | | pool_name, +
| | | type, +
| | | status, +
| | | indent, +
| | | country, +
| | | order_id, +
| | | customer_id, +
| | | external_key, +
| | | authoritative_source, +
| | | alarm_priority, +
| | | monitor, +
| | | vlan, +
| | | added, +
| | | last_modified, +
| | | children, +
| | | total_addresses, +
| | | used_addresses, +
| | | free_addresses, +
| | | avps, +
| | | expires +
| | | FROM ( +
| | | SELECT DISTINCT ON(vrf_rt_order(vrf.rt), p1.prefix) p1.id,+
| | | p1.prefix, +
| | | p1.display_prefix, +
| | | p1.description, +
| | | p1.comment, +
| | | COALESCE(p1.inherited_tags, '{}') AS inherited_tags, +
| | | COALESCE(p1.tags, '{}') AS tags, +
| | | p1.node, +
| | |
(6 rows)

nipap=>

What should i do?

@lethalwp
Copy link
Author

so let me resume: the already mentionned 1077
#1095
#1169

are all the same problem:
when there are too many subnets (or hosts) in a subnet, the query will take too much time.

This issue is already several years old.

As sexy as NIPAP is, it doesn't look to be scalable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant