Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(idea/object-storage): Object-Storageの役割について #17

Closed
See2et opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #31
Closed

docs(idea/object-storage): Object-Storageの役割について #17

See2et opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #31
Assignees

Comments

@See2et
Copy link
Member

See2et commented Jul 8, 2024

No description provided.

@AsPulse AsPulse moved this to Backlog in Project Sutera Jul 8, 2024
@AsPulse AsPulse changed the title docs(idea): Object-Storageの役割について docs(idea/object): Object-Storageの役割について Jul 8, 2024
@tukiminya
Copy link
Member

@AsPulse Request Summary!

@AsPulse AsPulse moved this from Backlog to Ready in Project Sutera Jul 8, 2024
@See2et See2et assigned HMasataka and unassigned tukiminya Jul 13, 2024
@AsPulse
Copy link
Contributor

AsPulse commented Jul 13, 2024

  • 非ユーザー依存データを保存する
  • Suteraネットワーク内のObject-Storageコンポーネントのうち、自動的に複数箇所へと保管される
  • もしBloomが死んだら、データを持っている他のものから埋め戻す (ネットワーク内で一定数の複製を保つ)
  • 大事なワールドとかのコピーは指定の(self-hostedの)Bloomに持たせるという運用もできる
    • まれ、かつ仕方ないことではあるけど、同じデータの複製を持ってる全てのbloomが同時にinactiveになるとデータのロストがありえる

@AsPulse AsPulse changed the title docs(idea/object): Object-Storageの役割について docs(idea/object-storage): Object-Storageの役割について Jul 13, 2024
@HMasataka HMasataka moved this from Ready to In progress in Project Sutera Jul 13, 2024
@HMasataka HMasataka moved this from In progress to In review in Project Sutera Jul 13, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in Project Sutera Jul 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants