Devices from other application with similar device-id prefix shown in sidebar's top end devices

[StevenCellist]

Summary

I have access to two applications, both with devices that have their device-id starting with mapquester. Similar to #7321, these devices show up in the other application, but apparently also in the sidebar which I didn't notice before.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Create two applications
2. Register devices in both that have an identical prefix for their device-ids
3. Check the top end devices once they appear there

Current Result

There are only two devices in this application, but the sidebar on the left lists four more (R/G/B/001a) that are from a similar but other application. Not actually a leak because I have access to both either way, but not very much supposed to happen :)

Expected Result

Don't show the devices :)

Relevant Logs

No response

URL

No response

Deployment

The Things Stack Community Edition

The Things Stack Version

v3.33.0.3c8e962fdd

Client Name and Version

No response

Other Information

No response

Proposed Fix

No response

Contributing

• I can help by doing more research.
• I can help by implementing a fix after the proposal above is approved.
• I can help by testing the fix before it's released.

Validation

• The fix is tested in a staging environment.
• The fix is documented in The Things Stack Documentation

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow TTN's Community Code of Conduct.

[KrishnaIyer]

Hmm I don't think we use a prefix to filter the device IDs, we use the application identifier. @ryaplots can you see if we can reproduce this?

[StevenCellist]

FYI: the application ID for both applications also use the same prefix 😅 (mapquester vs mapquester-v1).

[ryaplots]

Yeah so we indeed don't use prefixs to filter either device IDs or application IDs. I took a quick look and couldn't reproduce this. But what happens in the screenshot is indeed wrong, because only the top devices of the currently open application should be displayed in the applications layer. So I will look more into it