Given an integer array nums
, return true
if there exists a triple of indices (i, j, k)
such that i < j < k
and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]
. If no such indices exists, return false
.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5] Output: true Explanation: Any triplet where i < j < k is valid.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [5,4,3,2,1] Output: false Explanation: No triplet exists.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [2,1,5,0,4,6] Output: true Explanation: The triplet (3, 4, 5) is valid because nums[3] == 0 < nums[4] == 4 < nums[5] == 6.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 5 * 105
-231 <= nums[i] <= 231 - 1
Follow up: Could you implement a solution that runs in
O(n)
time complexity and O(1)
space complexity?
Companies:
Google, Facebook, Amazon
Similar Questions:
- Longest Increasing Subsequence (Medium)
- Count Special Quadruplets (Easy)
- Count Good Triplets in an Array (Hard)
This is a simplified version of 300. Longest Increasing Subsequence (Medium).
It's a regret greedy algorithm. We maintain a mono-increasing subsequence. For each A[i]
, we use it to replace the first number in the subsequence that is >= A[i]
.
It's simplified compared to LIS because we only need to keep a subsequence of length 3.
// OJ: https://leetcode.com/problems/increasing-triplet-subsequence/
// Author: github.com/lzl124631x
// Time: O(N)
// Space: O(1)
class Solution {
public:
bool increasingTriplet(vector<int>& A) {
int first = INT_MAX, second = INT_MAX;
for (int n : A) {
if (n <= first) first = n;
else if (n <= second) second = n;
else return true;
}
return false;
}
};