You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe we can adapt these examples, and run them on Tracker, ReverseDiff, Zygote and ThArrays to get a better picture of Julia reverse-mode AD libraries' true performance.
In addition to the examples above, we should try to include at least one example for each of the following
I've been experienced a few cases that Zygote can have quite different stability agasint Tracker when using Flux (e.g. FluxML/Flux.jl#914 and FluxML/Flux.jl#876).
A recent case where the (naively-implemented) logistic regression model was runnable with Tracker but fails with ReverseDiff seems to be another case which makes me think we should inlcude numerical statbility as an aspect.
Our benchmarking about AD is a bit ad-hoc, and in-complete at the moment. There are some nice benchmarking scripts in the following repos:
Maybe we can adapt these examples, and run them on Tracker, ReverseDiff, Zygote and ThArrays to get a better picture of Julia reverse-mode AD libraries' true performance.
In addition to the examples above, we should try to include at least one example for each of the following
Related #1140
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: