Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use of Xpert consumable is not correctly logged #1602

Open
sakshimohan opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Use of Xpert consumable is not correctly logged #1602

sakshimohan opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sakshimohan
Copy link
Collaborator

The use of Xpert consumable (item_code 187) is currently logged as 0 across all scenarios generated by job_id htm_and_hss_runs-2025-01-16T135243Z comparing horizontal versus vertical investments.

The tb module seems to request the use of Xpert correctly because it is logged as Not_Available under tlo.methods.healthsystem.summary, and the quantity not available correctly increases under TB scale up scenarios.

Xpert is delivered at level 2 facilities, with an average consumable availability recorded at 31%. The availability is 0% at level 1b facilities. The healthsystems.py module takes the average availability across levels 1b and level 2 (by district and month), so this is likely to bring the average availability down for the merged level 1b and 2 facilities used in the simulation, but not down to 0. So it's not clear what's happening here.

Additionally, there are major challenges with the disaggregated estimates of availability by month. For all districts, for 7 months, the availability recorded is close to 0 as per LMIS data. This is probably an artefact of OpenLMIS errors and needs to be corrected. See attached the availability at level 2 facilities by District (rows) and month (columns).

Image

sakshimohan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2025
- this is a temporary fix while issue #1602 gets sorted
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants