-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Travis builds are slow #41
Comments
Another option is to just to put in the documentation for installation a piece about Anywhere that |
Agreed. I'll put that in place. |
Example to use mini-conda: https://gist.github.com/dan-blanchard/7045057 |
I'll probably work on this today if #82 works out fine matplolib and pandas also slow down the build quite a bit so would like to make it all faster so we can get results back quicker |
We excluded scikit-bio from the requirements file so this is no longer tested and no longer slow |
reopening as we are going to convert the build to miniconda |
Ya, if you look at RTD builds you will see them failing as well due to slow builds. I think it was mostly numpy, but ya |
Options as I see them:
We could support both pip- and conda- style installations for bio_pieces, but use
conda
for the travis builds (you could also have another travis build script that did a traditional pip install which you run every once in a while). User's at WRAIR can continue to use the pip-style install. This would, however, make installingpathdiscov
more painful. so:group_references
into a separate project, or into pathdiscov itself (like originally)requirements.txt
files/Optional build structure? (aka, don't installmake_pca
by default). Not sure how this would be done.pathdiscov
to useconda
.Note:
scikit-bio
does not work on windows (not that we have any windows users)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: