Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis builds are slow #41

Open
averagehat opened this issue Aug 13, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Travis builds are slow #41

averagehat opened this issue Aug 13, 2015 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@averagehat
Copy link
Contributor

Options as I see them:

We could support both pip- and conda- style installations for bio_pieces, but use conda for the travis builds (you could also have another travis build script that did a traditional pip install which you run every once in a while). User's at WRAIR can continue to use the pip-style install. This would, however, make installing pathdiscov more painful. so:

  1. Move group_references into a separate project, or into pathdiscov itself (like originally)
  2. Separate requirements.txt files/Optional build structure? (aka, don't install make_pca by default). Not sure how this would be done.
  3. Change pathdiscov to use conda.

Note: scikit-bio does not work on windows (not that we have any windows users)

@necrolyte2
Copy link
Member

Another option is to just to put in the documentation for installation a piece about scikit-bio as well as make_pca.

Anywhere that scikit-bio is imported would then have a try,except block that exits with an error if it is not installed and explains that it has to be installed manually.

@averagehat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agreed. I'll put that in place.

This was referenced Aug 14, 2015
Closed
@necrolyte2
Copy link
Member

Example to use mini-conda: https://gist.github.com/dan-blanchard/7045057

@necrolyte2 necrolyte2 changed the title Travis builds are slow with scikit-* Travis builds are slow Jan 7, 2016
@necrolyte2
Copy link
Member

I'll probably work on this today if #82 works out fine

matplolib and pandas also slow down the build quite a bit so would like to make it all faster so we can get results back quicker

@necrolyte2 necrolyte2 self-assigned this Jan 7, 2016
@averagehat
Copy link
Contributor Author

We excluded scikit-bio from the requirements file so this is no longer tested and no longer slow

@averagehat
Copy link
Contributor Author

reopening as we are going to convert the build to miniconda

@averagehat averagehat reopened this Mar 16, 2016
@averagehat averagehat added this to the Use anaconda milestone Mar 16, 2016
@necrolyte2
Copy link
Member

Ya, if you look at RTD builds you will see them failing as well due to slow builds. I think it was mostly numpy, but ya

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants