-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
will NanoCaller support dorado basecaller with R10.4.1 flowcells? #48
Comments
I asked this a while ago on #42 and have had no answer so I assume the answer is no? |
this issue is being addressed |
That's great! What is the model name for R10.4.1 called by dorado? |
Hi, our internal testing shows that NanoCaller models perform extremely well with R10.4.1 dataset. This can be attributed to the fact that NanoCaller only relies on basecalls and not the underlying signal data, so more accurate basecalls will result in more accurate variant calling. Below is the evaluation on HG002 77X coverage R10.4.1 (4kHz) dataset from https://registry.opendata.aws/ont-open-data/. I will perform a more rigorous test and upload the results to replace the R9.4.1 case study. Given the high performance of provided models of NanoCaller on R10.4.1 datasets, we do not plan to train and release R10.4.1 specific models in the near future. This is something we will explore later, but it is not a high priority issue at the moment. Any new model release will likely accompany necessary upgrades to the core NanoCaller algorithm to reflect the advances made in this field over the years. SNP CallingHG002_GRCh38_alldifficultregions: snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_AllTandemRepeatsandHomopolymers_slop5: snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_easy_regions: snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_lowmappabilityall: snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_MHC: snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_segdups: snp performance
HG002_minus_homopolymer_repeats: snp performance
whole_genome: snp performance
Indel CallingHG002_GRCh38_alldifficultregions:non_snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_AllTandemRepeatsandHomopolymers_slop5:non_snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_easy_regions:non_snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_lowmappabilityall:non_snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_MHC:non_snp performance
HG002_GRCh38_segdups:non_snp performance
HG002_minus_homopolymer_repeats:non_snp performance
whole_genome:non_snp performance
|
The same question here. Given the situation that Guppy has been deprecated, will NanoCaller support dorado basecaller with R10.4.1 flowcells?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: