Lint the Codebase and Create CI/CD workflow for the same

[uzaxirr]

Currently the codebase is not properly linted, when we run golangci-lint run in the root of repository we get many errors, so it is desirable to fix them up and create a GitHub action workflow for the same to avoid bumping into this in future

[Shofiya2003]

Hey!
Can I work on the issue?
Here, we need GitHub Action workflow for linting. Right?

[uzaxirr]

Hey @Shofiya2003

Yes, You can work on this. Assigning this to you right away

Here, we need GitHub Action workflow for linting. Right?

Yes we do need an workflow for linting and also you need to fix the currently existing issues (shown in the above screen-shot) that occurs when running a linter so that the GitHub actions checks may pass.

@abhishekraj272 should we remove the dev()function as it was used just for temporary testing and is currently being flagged by the linter

[abskrj]

yes, we can remove the dev function now

[Shofiya2003]

Hey!

• first I should resolve the errors we get when we run golangci-lint
• use GitHub actions to set up the workflow for golang ci lint actions

[uzaxirr]

Hey!

• first I should resolve the errors we get when we run golangci-lint
• use GitHub actions to set up the workflow for golang ci lint actions

Sounds like a plan!

[chauhan17nitin]

Hey!

• first I should resolve the errors we get when we run golangci-lint
• use GitHub actions to set up the workflow for golang ci lint actions

Sounds like a plan!

Have a suggestion here 🤔 , may be you guys can decide on it accordingly 😅

i see if we will start resolving golangci-lint error here, that may take considerable amount of time, + at the same time other people will be committing un-linted code,

there is a param issues in golang-ci-lint configuration
if we mark the new inside it as true, then it will only analyze the new coming code that it is correctly linted on not.

At first we can start with that and create a pipeline 🟢 so that new coming code is correct, later on when old files code will be edited linting will come into play 😄 .

Just wanted to say we can do it progressively instead of resolving all errors in one go (which may be frustrating sometimes 😞 ).

At the end decision will be yours 💯 .

[abskrj]

Yeah, sounds good

…

On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 6:36 PM, Nitin Chauhan ***@***.***> wrote: Hey! - first I should resolve the errors we get when we run golangci-lint - use GitHub actions to set up the workflow for golang ci lint actions Sounds like a plan! Have a suggestion here 🤔 , may be you guys can decide on it accordingly 😅 i see if we will start resolving golangci-lint error here, that may take considerable amount of time, + at the same time other people will be committing un-linted code, there is a param issues in golang-ci-lint configuration if we mark the new inside it as true, then it will only analyze the new coming code that it is correctly linted on not. At first we can start with that and create a pipeline 🟢 so that new coming code is correct, later on when old files code will be edited linting will come into play 😄 . Just wanted to say we can do it progressively instead of resolving all errors in one go (which may be frustrating sometimes 😞 ). At the end decision will be yours 💯 . — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#32 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGO7IBRROIVZ5YP55FJGQLDWRFS6VANCNFSM6AAAAAATOI7DPA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Shofiya2003]

Alrighty