Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

do better messaging than WARNING:Halmos:Counterexample (potentially invalid) if evm_exp is the reason the model is invalid #280

Open
karmacoma-eth opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

do better messaging than WARNING:Halmos:Counterexample (potentially invalid) if evm_exp is the reason the model is invalid #280

karmacoma-eth opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@karmacoma-eth
Copy link
Collaborator

we actually do have an option that can help:

Solver options:
  --smt-exp-by-const N  interpret constant power up to N (default: 2)
@karmacoma-eth karmacoma-eth added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@karmacoma-eth