-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider routing over piers to get access to ferries #263
Comments
I see. Seems there were some edit wars on the issue when iD tried to enforce validation rules to add a highway tag in such cases: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/69818/should-a-pier-be-tagged-as-highway Same for railway=platform : openstreetmap/iD#6409 So maybe we should add both as implying highway=footway? |
Sounds reasonable. |
Piers and Ferries. Brouter. GraphHopper. OSRM. Openstreetmap. |
Yes, I think it would be good to add man_made=pier to lookups.dat, the wiki indicates it is a raised walkway over water, see also #416 A problem is maybe that there are many more man_made tags (in ways context) that are not interesting, like storage_tank, cutline, pipeline, silo:
You do not want these other's to be included
That is tagged 1502 times. the more popular tag is public_transport=platform
|
Added
to the #416 |
If BRouter routed over piers, it would be far easier to use ferries when planning a route. Currently you have to force the route by using a lot of via points (which have to be placed very precisely for them to work, if they help at all), and in some cases routing fails completely (see #264).
Test case
Routing in BRouter-Web (notice missing route segments):
The pier is already mapped, though:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: