You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This approach does not effectively represent the overall state of the pipeline, as it doesn't distinguish between different failure levels of child jobs. Instead, a better strategy would be to set the parent jobs status based on the worst status among child jobs. The benefits is to provide a more accurate summary of pipeline execution, which is really helpful when child jobs are test jobs and we need to know if jobs is unstable ( tests finished) or failed , aborted ( tests might not be finished at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The existing strategy for determining the parent job status is based on whether child jobs succeed. If any child job doesn't succeed the parent job is marked 'Failure' https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/blob/master/buildenv/jenkins/aqaTestPipeline.groovy#L316-L318, even if the worst child jobs status is 'unstable'.
This approach does not effectively represent the overall state of the pipeline, as it doesn't distinguish between different failure levels of child jobs. Instead, a better strategy would be to set the parent jobs status based on the worst status among child jobs. The benefits is to provide a more accurate summary of pipeline execution, which is really helpful when child jobs are test jobs and we need to know if jobs is unstable ( tests finished) or failed , aborted ( tests might not be finished at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: