You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
adamfarley opened this issue
Feb 27, 2025
· 1 comment
Labels
openj9Issues that are enhancements or bugs raised against the OpenJ9 groupquestionIssues that are queries about the code base or potential problems that have been spotted
Should we cherry pick cacerts updates that occur in the master branch between the branching for the dry-run and the final GA builds?
OpenJ9 noticed an issue where there ones were different from ours because they are not currently basing things from our release branches.
References:
github-actionsbot
added
openj9
Issues that are enhancements or bugs raised against the OpenJ9 group
question
Issues that are queries about the code base or potential problems that have been spotted
labels
Feb 27, 2025
My 2¢ on the subject - it would be preferable to use the closest to the GA to be as up to date as is practical at the time we ship (since we would typically not refresh a release just for a cacerts update so I would rather cherry pick.
The docs should be updated if we start doing this to indicate that the cherry pick should be done on the day before release (or maybe on the Tuesday and ideally run one build job though to ensure the new file doesn't cause any failures.
openj9Issues that are enhancements or bugs raised against the OpenJ9 groupquestionIssues that are queries about the code base or potential problems that have been spotted
Originally posted by @sxa in #64
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: