-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable Docker integration on boards #2120
Comments
Hi 👋. Thank you for submitting your first issue to Homarr. Please ensure that you've provided all nessesary information. You can use the three dots > Edit button to update your post with additional images and information. Depending on the current volume of requests, the team should get in conact with you shortly. |
I don't personally use or have coded on that part at all, but from what I remember, only admin's have access to the docker page. The button is present according to the user, not the board. If you're an admin, it'll show up everywhere, yes, if you're not, then you shouldn't have it. |
Oh I see, thanks for clarifying. I'll verify and let you know if the button is indeed present for non-admin users as well. |
Hello 👋, this issue has been open for 60 days without activity. We mark issues to help prioritise and close dead issues. Can you confirm that this issue is still relevant on the latest version? I'll remove the stale label as soon as there is further activity on this issue. Thank you 🙏 |
Description
I'd love it if we could restrict the access to Docker on specific boards. Currently, per my understanding, each board automatically comes with the Docker "tile" in the upper right corner (next to the Edit Mode), which enables anybody with access to the board to manage all Docker services running on the same host
Thinking in terms of security and practicability, it might be nice to be able to remove that tile from certain boards if we know the users accessing that board won't have a need to mess around with Docker applications (e.g., they just need some links to internal services).
Does that make sense and if so, would it be possible to implement this (after the release of 1.0)?
Either way, thanks to everyone working on this project for putting in them time and providing it to us free of charge!
Priority
Low (Nice-to-have)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: