We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Just forwarding a recommendation I got to use data tables:
cucumber-rs/cucumber#183 (comment)
Instead
And I build an application transaction with the transient account, the current application, suggested params, operation "create", approval-program "programs/big_app_program.teal.tok", clear-program "programs/big_app_program.teal.tok", global-bytes <global-bytes>, global-ints 0, local-bytes <local-bytes>, local-ints 0, app-args "", foreign-apps "", foreign-assets "", app-accounts "", extra-pages 3
do (or similar)
And I build an application transaction with | operation | create | | approval-program | programs/big_app_program.teal.tok | | clear-program | programs/big_app_program.teal.tok | | global-bytes | <global-bytes> | | global-ints | 0 | | local-bytes | <local-bytes> | | local-ints | 0 | | app-args | | | foreign-apps | | | foreign-assets | | | app-accounts | | | extra-pages | 3 |
It would be easier both read/match the step and access the table data via gherkin::Step.
I imagine that these kind of changes are difficult to do, since they'd break the tests in all the SDKs, but worth maybe for future features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Just forwarding a recommendation I got to use data tables:
cucumber-rs/cucumber#183 (comment)
I imagine that these kind of changes are difficult to do, since they'd break the tests in all the SDKs, but worth maybe for future features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: