Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testOxfordDataset.sh fails with "BAD" descriptors, keypoints, and features #80

Open
andrew-hardin opened this issue Apr 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@andrew-hardin
Copy link
Contributor

andrew-hardin commented Apr 10, 2020

I'm hunting for a GPU accelerated version of SIFT that's comparable to existing CPU options. I'm looking at popsift because it's marketed as creating similar features to OpenCV or VLFeat. After building develop, I ran make prepare-test and make run-test. A snippet of the output is included below:

pyramid compare: /volatile/popsift-test2/build/reference/ubc/output-img2/dir-octave/pyramid-o-7-l-4.pgm and pyramid-o-7-l-4.pgm differ
...
DoG compare: /volatile/popsift-test2/build/reference/ubc/output-img2/dir-dog/d-pyramid-o-0-l-0.pgm and d-pyramid-o-0-l-0.pgm differ
...
Keypoints BAD. Descriptors BAD. 
Compare leuven img6 with reference. Features BAD. 
cmp /redacted/build/reference/leuven/output-img6/features.txt /redacted/build/oxford/leuven/output-img6/features.txt

I visually compared two PGM files and verified that they do appear slightly different:
3w5t6h

Environment and build details:

  • CUDA: 10.2
  • Driver: 440.64.00
  • Device: GeForce RTX 2070
  • Config: Release
  • Commit: '3e624d'

Should I expect these tests to pass? Or, are slight variations expected?

@simogasp
Copy link
Member

Not that it matters, but are u using the develop or your branch from the PR of removing boost? (just to know how to reproduce etc)

We should ask @griwodz , I remember that at some point there was a bug with the pgm library but it think it should have been solved.

@andrew-hardin
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was testing the Release configuration on develop with no modifications (commit 3e624d).

@tkircher
Copy link

I have the exact same configuration, but commit f63d305. Same issue, bad descriptors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants