You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like there is a problem with the Whitaker's output when we have multiple dict elements with differing frequency or spelling of principal parts. We get only one mean element and it's not clear which dict element it applies to and the other meanings are missing. This might be a problem with our xml API enhancement to whitakers or it might be in the original source. Either way, fixing it would require revisiting the Ada code...
Example output below.
Words found so far that have this issue:
aberis
adero
adjuvo (adiuvabo, adiuvante,...)
alo ( 'alitus' vs 'altus' in principal parts)
amicio ('amixi' vs 'amicui' in principal parts)
apta
auxilio
beatricem (trico vs tricor)
blandiatur (blandio vs blandior)
caedo (caecidi vs cacidi)
cape (here we have some garbage in one of the hdwds "capio, capere, additional, forms")
clave, claves, clavis
comedo (comessus vs comestus vs comesus)
como
commoraris (commoro vs commoror)
congredior
contemplur (contemplo vs contemplor)
coque (coquos vs coquus)
criminati (crimino vs criminor)
cunctor (cunctor; cunctari; cunctatus vs cuncto; cunctare; cunctavi; cunctatus)
desino (desino; desinere; desivi; desitus vs desino; desinare; desavi; desatus)
duco (some garbage in one of the hdwds "duco; ducere; additional; forms")
edo (essus vs esus)
emere (emereo vs emereor)
excurro (excurro; excurrere; excucurri; excursus vs excurro; excurrere; excurri; excursus)
felem (felis vs feles)
grammaticae
ibis
imitandum (imito/imitor)
industrius (industriior vs industrior)
inferus
insuper
iocari (joco vs jocor)
itinera (itiner vs itiner)
lacrimante (lacrimo vs lacrimor)
lactis (lac vs lact)
lamentari (lamento/lamentor)
latrina (latrina/latrinum)
lavo (lavatus v lautos v lotus)
merendam (mereo vs mereor)
mille (millis vs milis)
misereror (misereo vs misereror vs miseret)
obsonatum (obsono vs obsonor)
odi (odeo vs odio)
ostendere (ostendo vs ostendeo)
pantheum (vs pantheom)
physicae (a big mess)
poto (potatus vs potus)
pradium (prandii vs prandi(i)
prodito (prodo vs prodeo)
promo (prompsi vs promsi)
pungo (pupugi vs pepgui)
quasi
salit (salo vs saleo)
scio (scivi vs scivi(ii)
scrutari (scruto vs scrutor)
septimia (septim vs septem)
sicut (adv vs conjunction)
spondeo (spopondi vs spepondi)
tueor (tuitus vs tutus)
vello (volsi vs velli)
balmas
changed the title
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing freq
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing freq or principal parts
Aug 8, 2018
balmas
changed the title
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing freq or principal parts
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing freq or principal parts spelling
Aug 8, 2018
balmas
changed the title
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing freq or principal parts spelling
whitaker's: missing meanings for words with multi dict differing principal parts spelling
Aug 13, 2018
Looking at these more closely, I think most, if not all are due to differences in the spellings of the principal parts. We probably normalize this via the morph-client see alpheios-project/morph-client#17
It looks like there is a problem with the Whitaker's output when we have multiple dict elements with differing frequency or spelling of principal parts. We get only one mean element and it's not clear which dict element it applies to and the other meanings are missing. This might be a problem with our xml API enhancement to whitakers or it might be in the original source. Either way, fixing it would require revisiting the Ada code...
Example output below.
Words found so far that have this issue:
aberis
adero
adjuvo (adiuvabo, adiuvante,...)
alo ( 'alitus' vs 'altus' in principal parts)
amicio ('amixi' vs 'amicui' in principal parts)
apta
auxilio
beatricem (trico vs tricor)
blandiatur (blandio vs blandior)
caedo (caecidi vs cacidi)
cape (here we have some garbage in one of the hdwds "capio, capere, additional, forms")
clave, claves, clavis
comedo (comessus vs comestus vs comesus)
como
commoraris (commoro vs commoror)
congredior
contemplur (contemplo vs contemplor)
coque (coquos vs coquus)
criminati (crimino vs criminor)
cunctor (cunctor; cunctari; cunctatus vs cuncto; cunctare; cunctavi; cunctatus)
desino (desino; desinere; desivi; desitus vs desino; desinare; desavi; desatus)
duco (some garbage in one of the hdwds "duco; ducere; additional; forms")
edo (essus vs esus)
emere (emereo vs emereor)
excurro (excurro; excurrere; excucurri; excursus vs excurro; excurrere; excurri; excursus)
felem (felis vs feles)
grammaticae
ibis
imitandum (imito/imitor)
industrius (industriior vs industrior)
inferus
insuper
iocari (joco vs jocor)
itinera (itiner vs itiner)
lacrimante (lacrimo vs lacrimor)
lactis (lac vs lact)
lamentari (lamento/lamentor)
latrina (latrina/latrinum)
lavo (lavatus v lautos v lotus)
merendam (mereo vs mereor)
mille (millis vs milis)
misereror (misereo vs misereror vs miseret)
obsonatum (obsono vs obsonor)
odi (odeo vs odio)
ostendere (ostendo vs ostendeo)
pantheum (vs pantheom)
physicae (a big mess)
poto (potatus vs potus)
pradium (prandii vs prandi(i)
prodito (prodo vs prodeo)
promo (prompsi vs promsi)
pungo (pupugi vs pepgui)
quasi
salit (salo vs saleo)
scio (scivi vs scivi(ii)
scrutari (scruto vs scrutor)
septimia (septim vs septem)
sicut (adv vs conjunction)
spondeo (spopondi vs spepondi)
tueor (tuitus vs tutus)
vello (volsi vs velli)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: