License of this library, GPL or LGPL? #949
Unanswered
SpieringsAE
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
@SpieringsAE : trying to get legal advice on github - is likely the wrong place. As for your questions of libiio, there are two groups of files in this repo:
What this means is you can use the library, under the LGPL, as long as your downstream users can replace/update the library when they want (either dynamically linking it, or by providing them the *.a files so they can rebuild things by hand - either is OK). -Robin |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm pretty new to the open source software environment, and 100% new to the legal side of it. And as I have a lot of respect for open source software and its creators I wish to handle this correctly.
I'm currently making a an open source project that uses this library, however I do not wish to use a GPL license on my project as I fear most of the people that use it would be strongly turned away by this. Under an LGPL license I can do this by using a dynamically linked library, but as I understand under a GPL license I can't.
The repository indicates both licenses so I'm not sure what my options are. Should I listen to the LGPL license which benefits me, or to the GPL license which hinders me?
To give a more clear picture of what is happening: I'm making a Matlab/Simulink blockset that will compile to C code and then machine code for an embedded Linux system which has IIO interfaces. It is this blockset that I wish to open source, but whatever someone else builds with it I would like to be free from the GPL license.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions