Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] [Master] TaskInstance set TimeoutFailed will not be killed when timeout #15545

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
ruanwenjun opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ruanwenjun
Copy link
Member

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

When we set the timeout flag to TimeoutFailed, the taskInstance will go to failed after timeout, but it will still running at worker side.

What you expected to happen

The TaskInstance will be killed when timeout.

How to reproduce

x x

Anything else

No response

Version

dev

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun added bug Something isn't working Waiting for reply Waiting for reply and removed Waiting for reply Waiting for reply labels Jan 31, 2024
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun changed the title [Bug] [Master] TaskInstance set TimeoutFailed will not be killed. [Bug] [Master] TaskInstance set TimeoutFailed will not be killed when timeout Jan 31, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Mar 2, 2024
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun removed the Stale label Mar 2, 2024
@ruanwenjun
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by already solved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant