Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Explore Low-Fidelity timestep options in LAMMPS #15

Open
ZoeRichter opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Question] Explore Low-Fidelity timestep options in LAMMPS #15

ZoeRichter opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Status:1-New No one has claimed this issue yet. It is in need of solving. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer.

Comments

@ZoeRichter
Copy link
Collaborator

Question or discussion topic.

The frictional contact force models in LAMMPS require very small timesteps that are sometimes much, much smaller than the total simulation time we may be interested in for a given project. If it is possible to run LAMMPS with a larger timestep - perhaps through a "low fidelity" mode that makes some simplifications/assumptions, that might help speed up wall-times.

Provide details.

Notably, it is possible to change the rate that things like dumped gifs, files, and LAMMPS logs output, but while this may appear to speed things up (particularly in the case of visualized LAMMPS run) this is not what we're looking for here.

External context or references.

How can this issue be closed?

This issue can be closed when it is determined, one way or another, if there is some sort of low fidelity/speed up assumption that can be used in LAMMPS.

@ZoeRichter ZoeRichter added Status:1-New No one has claimed this issue yet. It is in need of solving. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer. labels Oct 1, 2024
@ZoeRichter ZoeRichter self-assigned this Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status:1-New No one has claimed this issue yet. It is in need of solving. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant