Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move to a more flexible hardware definition for Helm #234

Open
tchataigner opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Move to a more flexible hardware definition for Helm #234

tchataigner opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tchataigner
Copy link
Contributor

The current Helm/K8S implementation for our proof server is mainly thought for a usage along the eksctl configuration file in the repository. It forces the users to have deployed hardware with a special tag, r7iz.metal-32xl to know which instances/nodes to deploy the cluster pods.

As mentioned by @huitseeker in #228, we could move away from this nodeSelector behavior and instead leverage ressources configuration.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tchataigner