Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why tarpc? #42

Open
rbtcollins opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

why tarpc? #42

rbtcollins opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@rbtcollins
Copy link

rbtcollins commented Feb 27, 2023

Hi ! (followed your link in Linkedin to github, but since the website linked in the github org metadata is a 404, I can't ask these naive questions outside of the bug tracker. Sorry!).

So the first one is - why tarpc? I mean, it seems nice, but it seems vulnerable to cross-language portability issues (such as having to redefine the protocol in every language, or use a transport orientated schema like openapi/swagger rather than the much more precise protobuf. google/tarpc#161 is closed but not particularly satisfactorily.

I had a good look around and couldn't find any motivating decision for this. I would have expected tower-rs+tonic or similar to be the default choice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant