Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the BACKBONE #38

Open
XJTU-Haolin opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question about the BACKBONE #38

XJTU-Haolin opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@XJTU-Haolin
Copy link

Hi,

SceneRF is a nice work and it is very helpful for me.

Currently, I'd like to revise SceneRF and integrate it into my work (I will definitely cite this work). I am meeting a challenge of how to switch the sphere backbone to standard ResNet elegantly. Will this modification directly lead to the failure of SceneRF? If the effect is acceptable, how to deal with it with minimal revision?

Could you give me any suggestions?

Thanks for your time!

Sincerely,
Haolin

@anhquancao
Copy link
Collaborator

anhquancao commented Oct 11, 2024

Hi,

You can just set:
add_fov_ver = 0
add_fov_ver = 0
add_fov_hor = 0
add_fov_hor = 0
in the following code
https://github.com/astra-vision/SceneRF/blob/main/scenerf/models/scenerf.py#L83

Anh the sphere_W and sphere_H to the image width and height, respectively in the code

https://github.com/astra-vision/SceneRF/blob/main/scenerf/models/scenerf.py#L77

We tested without spherical mapping in the paper, the performance decreases not very significant. This is mentioned in the Sec. ablation studies of the paper, paragraph Spherical U-Net.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants