-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Missing server.summary() function #1076
Open
2 tasks done
Labels
Comments
A small note here confirming the Parser-API is actually supporting that, so indeed this is a bug on this implementation 👍 https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-api/blob/master/docs/api.md#server |
AlexiusTatius
added a commit
to AlexiusTatius/parser-js
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2025
- summary(): Returns the server summary string or undefined - hasSummary(): Returns boolean indicating if summary exists - Added unit tests for the respective functions - Tested the code by building, ensuring changes in esm, cjs
AlexiusTatius
added a commit
to AlexiusTatius/parser-js
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2025
- summary(): Returns the server summary string or undefined - hasSummary(): Returns boolean indicating if summary exists - Added unit tests for the respective functions - Tested the code by building, ensuring changes in esm, cjs
AlexiusTatius
added a commit
to AlexiusTatius/parser-js
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2025
- summary(): Returns the server summary string or undefined - hasSummary(): Returns boolean indicating if summary exists - Added unit tests for the respective functions - Tested the code by building, ensuring changes in esm, cjs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug.
The Server Object doesn't have a way to access the summary attribute of a server.
Expected behavior
We should have a function called
.summary()
in the Server Object.Screenshots
Not relevant
How to Reproduce
Not relevant
🥦 Browser
None
👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?
🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
Are you willing to work on this issue ?
No, someone else can work on it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: