-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Speed comparison aria2c vs flash? #1
Comments
Hey @kootenpv! I run Windows :P but I already have aria2 installed. The problem with aria2 is, default max connections to a server is 16. I normally use 40-50 IP addresses so 16 was not enough for me, so I wrote my own downloader "Flash" PS. Flash uses multiple threads too. As of now, it uses |
Cool, very nice backstory! I just read up on IP, it's a clever addition over aria2c (even though in my case multiple threads were fine compared to requiring multiple IPs). If I were you I would add some kind of "official" benchmark to your readme, that'll help convince people it is very serious :) EDIT: And indeed, I missed that it is on Windows. It would probably be nice to make it work on all OSes. How are you creating multiple IPs? |
@kootenpv, I don't understand the question. On my college network, downloaded speed is limited per IP address but many IP addresses are unused. Say, the speed limit is 3 Mbps per IP addresses, and I use 30 - 40 IP addresses, I max out at ~100 Mbps. |
Hey, I'm wondering if you're sure you need different IP addresses... could you test out your tool and see if you can get a faster download speed in comparison to this tool (uses multiple threads):
You can then run the following command to use 16 threads:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: