You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can you please add a section number next to each section so that it will be easy to identify the sections in all windows (query, pointer, etc.).
Example:
If sections are hidden/filtered, they should be counted as well, but not displayed, so that if section 17 is filtered out then the list should display:
15
16
18
...
Or maybe you can make that optional in the preferences (sections counter include hidden sections enable/disable).
Also, can you please improve the sorting of the results. For example, the pointer scan results are all mixed instead of being sorted by base address ascending (or even better if that's the default, but we can sort the lists by clicking the column headers):
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pharaoh2k
changed the title
[Feature requests] Improve sections listing, including better sorting
[Feature request] Improve sections listing, including better sorting
Nov 7, 2022
Excellent. Thank you, Avan.
In addition to having it in the SectionView of Query, the section count/number is most useful and most important in the results, cheat list, and of course pointers list.
Could you please kindly add it to display in all parts of the software where sections are shown? (as in the first screenshot on this page).
Hi, Avan,
Can you please add a section number next to each section so that it will be easy to identify the sections in all windows (query, pointer, etc.).
Example:
If sections are hidden/filtered, they should be counted as well, but not displayed, so that if section 17 is filtered out then the list should display:
15
16
18
...
Or maybe you can make that optional in the preferences (sections counter include hidden sections enable/disable).
Also, can you please improve the sorting of the results. For example, the pointer scan results are all mixed instead of being sorted by base address ascending (or even better if that's the default, but we can sort the lists by clicking the column headers):
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: