Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apigateway: private domain name L2 construct #703

Open
1 of 11 tasks
jtmthf opened this issue Feb 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 11 tasks

apigateway: private domain name L2 construct #703

jtmthf opened this issue Feb 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
status/proposed Newly proposed RFC

Comments

@jtmthf
Copy link

jtmthf commented Feb 15, 2025

Description

As initially proposed here aws/aws-cdk/issues/33352, the goal is to create a set of L2 constructs for API Gateway custom domain names for private APIS. The three proposed constructs would be as follows:

  • PrivateDomainName maps to CfnDomainNameV2
  • PrivateBasePathMapping maps to CfnBasePathMappingV2
  • DomainNameAccessAssociation maps to CfnDomainNameAccessAssociation

The resulting solution would provide a straightforward path for users to launch private apis with custom domain names that matches the developer experience already available for public custom domain names.

Roles

Role User
Proposed by @jtmthf
Author(s) @jtmthf
API Bar Raiser
Stakeholders

See RFC Process for details

Workflow

  • Tracking issue created (label: status/proposed)
  • API bar raiser assigned (ping us at #aws-cdk-rfcs if needed)
  • Kick off meeting
  • RFC pull request submitted (label: status/review)
  • Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
  • API signed-off (label status/api-approved applied to pull request)
  • Final comments period (label: status/final-comments-period)
  • Approved and merged (label: status/approved)
  • Execution plan submitted (label: status/planning)
  • Plan approved and merged (label: status/implementing)
  • Implementation complete (label: status/done)

Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/proposed Newly proposed RFC
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant