You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Duplicate annotations are complicated.
It is not clear which annotation is going to be covered by which test.
While it would be nice to require only a single annotation
this may be overly restrictive.
Perhaps an additional property could be added?
Similar to //= type=test we could have something like //= dedup=my-arbitrary-string.
Obviously dedup is a poor name,
but having the flexibility put annotations in multiple locations
could be a requirement if the specification can not be adjusted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate annotations are complicated.
It is not clear which annotation is going to be covered by which test.
While it would be nice to require only a single annotation
this may be overly restrictive.
Perhaps an additional property could be added?
Similar to
//= type=test
we could have something like//= dedup=my-arbitrary-string
.Obviously
dedup
is a poor name,but having the flexibility put annotations in multiple locations
could be a requirement if the specification can not be adjusted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: