You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I used rfaa to test the posebuster set, but the precision I got was not as good as the 42% docking success rate mentioned in the article. I think my test protocol is not consistent with yours. Could you please share a complete test script to reproduce this precision?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've recently released a new benchmark that allows users to evaluate some of the most recent structure generation methods for protein-ligand docking (e.g., including RFAA on the PoseBusters Benchmark dataset). You can find code, data, and reproducibility instructions here: https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/PoseBench
Hi, I used rfaa to test the posebuster set, but the precision I got was not as good as the 42% docking success rate mentioned in the article. I think my test protocol is not consistent with yours. Could you please share a complete test script to reproduce this precision?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: