We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
liberica-openjdk-alpine:21 image (and I assume other images) still contains high CVEs Alpine fixed recently (3.21.3) :
liberica-openjdk-alpine:21
$ grype bellsoft/liberica-openjdk-alpine:21 --scope all-layers ✔ Vulnerability DB [updated] ✔ Pulled image ✔ Loaded image bellsoft/liberica-openjdk-alpine:21 ✔ Parsed image sha256:02cd6b0a2edbe069d2755012a490de09a2806429b7b9a5cc804aa685884686ef ✔ Cataloged contents 27df1be0dd4f9af8e708f3954fd1c985e96309a73e3f562afce9e0e927083a2c ├── ✔ Packages [17 packages] ├── ✔ File digests [227 files] ├── ✔ File metadata [227 locations] └── ✔ Executables [113 executables] ✔ Scanned for vulnerabilities [6 vulnerability matches] ├── by severity: 0 critical, 4 high, 2 medium, 0 low, 0 negligible └── by status: 6 fixed, 0 not-fixed, 0 ignored NAME INSTALLED FIXED-IN TYPE VULNERABILITY SEVERITY libcrypto3 3.3.2-r4 3.3.3-r0 apk CVE-2024-12797 High libcrypto3 3.3.2-r4 3.3.2-r5 apk CVE-2024-13176 Medium libssl3 3.3.2-r4 3.3.3-r0 apk CVE-2024-12797 High libssl3 3.3.2-r4 3.3.2-r5 apk CVE-2024-13176 Medium musl 1.2.5-r8 1.2.5-r9 apk CVE-2025-26519 High musl-utils 1.2.5-r8 1.2.5-r9 apk CVE-2025-26519 High
More generally, is there a way we get more up-to-date images with Alpine upstream, or is this a desired behavior ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for pointing this out, new images based on Alpine 3.21.3 have been pushed to Dockerhub, Github and Azure registries.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
liberica-openjdk-alpine:21
image (and I assume other images) still contains high CVEs Alpine fixed recently (3.21.3) :More generally, is there a way we get more up-to-date images with Alpine upstream, or is this a desired behavior ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: