You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
An unusual behavior from the default pick_open_reference_otus.py pipeline. Samples which are seen with low counts after min_count filtering can then be preserved in the final biom table even though they have no sequences. As an example:
This initially lead me to some confusion about why some samples with no sequences are preserved in the biom table, but other samples, like those with 0 sequences from split_libraries.py are not carried through.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it's just something that slipped through - I wouldn't really call it a bug, since it's correct, it's just strange since it's different than how this is usually handled in QIIME. I think we should stick with filtering (filter_samples_from_otu_table.py -n 1 would let you work around this) for now, since the focus is on QIIME 2 development now except for critical bug fixes.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
An unusual behavior from the default
pick_open_reference_otus.py
pipeline. Samples which are seen with low counts aftermin_count
filtering can then be preserved in the final biom table even though they have no sequences. As an example:This initially lead me to some confusion about why some samples with no sequences are preserved in the biom table, but other samples, like those with 0 sequences from
split_libraries.py
are not carried through.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: