Is @VerbClient desired?

[bradleydwyer]

The behaviour of Kotlin for generating client impls within a module is different to Go (manual declaration vs automatic). Is this intentional?

[stuartwdouglas]

There is an issue for it, it needs to be done via annotation processors to work correctly.

I also don't know how much actual demand there is for invoking verbs within the same module (other than SQL verbs, which are different), which is why I have not really prioritized this.

[stuartwdouglas]

I could probably actually just have a client that looks like convert: LocalClient<ConvertRequest>, this is still type safe, but it avoids needed to define a new class, and the build would fail if there is no 'convert' verb locally.