Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using the gt package #18

Open
mbcann01 opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Consider using the gt package #18

mbcann01 opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New technological (as opposed to content) feature or request

Comments

@mbcann01
Copy link
Member

Overview

I was looking through the gt package documentation last night. Perhaps we should consider using this package for the tables instead of flextable.

@mbcann01 mbcann01 converted this from a draft issue Feb 29, 2024
@mbcann01 mbcann01 self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@mbcann01 mbcann01 added the enhancement New technological (as opposed to content) feature or request label Feb 29, 2024
@edambo
Copy link
Collaborator

edambo commented Mar 2, 2024

Why do you want to move from flextables? Is there some functionality you're interested in? According to this (if I'm understanding it correctly), gt doesn't support Word and the default output to Word will be a flextable anyway.

@mbcann01 mbcann01 moved this from Todo to On Hold in DETECT Public Mar 4, 2024
@mbcann01
Copy link
Member Author

mbcann01 commented Mar 5, 2024

Great question, @edambo ! For starters, I know we have higher priorities right now than this. So, it's totally fine if we don't get around to it for awhile.

When we were using the DT package to create tables, I didn't love the way they looked, but I did like how they could scroll. Some of the flextables look more squished to me than I would like in an ideal world. Having said that, if we want the ability to export them to word, I guess we can't rely on scrolling. Also, I didn't realize the GT package wouldn't create word tables. This might be a dead end. I just came across the package in a blog post and thought it looked interesting. I didn't dig into it very far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New technological (as opposed to content) feature or request
Projects
Status: On Hold
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants