Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a license that is less "code oriented" #128

Open
Remi-Gau opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Use a license that is less "code oriented" #128

Remi-Gau opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Member

Remi-Gau commented Dec 5, 2022

    > Sorry for my late response. I think it would much more readable if we do a point licenses and make sub points of licenses. The apache license for example is for me not detailed written, to make a separate point. I know that we wanted to create a glossary that includes all facts we need. but I would not list every single license. I think the best way would be to summarize the licenses and describe the differences of the type there and maybe make a short list of the most important.

Talking about linceces: this repo has a licence for "code" but not for "content", correct?

Might be better to have the content of the book be under CC-BY (or something like that) as the BSD licences we have might not be best for that.

I think we talked about that but it was never implemented.

Originally posted by @Remi-Gau in #50 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant