You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A concise description of why we're pursuing this task.
Technically, intergenic sites are those that do not have a gene track annotation. However, for querying purposes, "intergenic" is much nicer to search for than "!exists:refSeq"
Completion Criteria:
What is the goal, and how do we know this task is accomplished?
Get feedback on our current handling from Dave/Thomas and members of Thomas' lab, and decide on next steps
akotlar
changed the title
Decide on whether to output "intergenic" refSeq.siteType, or keep it as missing
[annotation] Decide on whether to output "intergenic" refSeq.siteType, or keep it as missing
Oct 26, 2023
Background:
A concise description of why we're pursuing this task.
Technically, intergenic sites are those that do not have a gene track annotation. However, for querying purposes, "intergenic" is much nicer to search for than "!exists:refSeq"
Completion Criteria:
What is the goal, and how do we know this task is accomplished?
Get feedback on our current handling from Dave/Thomas and members of Thomas' lab, and decide on next steps
cc @cristinaetrv
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: