convert the still baddly mapped plant_id_eia's in the depreciation sheet.

[cmgosnell]

We used to map the depreciation studies to plant_id_pudl. That was bad bc they change over time. So I converted this id to the plant_id_eia... but there are a lot of records and there are some known errors.

This issue should include:

• identifying the poorly mapped records
  • the records that are mapped to plant_id_eia's that DON'T EXIST lol see code snipped below
  • the records that we've been unable to match to EIA on the granular level bc of the plant id
  • other wayyys?
• fix those records (bc we have some mannual overrides this needs to be done in multiple places)
  • in the deprish_raw.xlsx sheet in the raw tab
  • in the deprish_raw.xlsx sheet in the EIA-deprish matching tab
  • in the deprish_common_labels.xlsx sheet

>>> # pudl output object
>>> pudl_settings = pudl.workspace.setup.get_defaults()
>>> pudl_engine = sa.create_engine(pudl_settings["pudl_db"])
>>> pudl_out = pudl.output.pudltabl.PudlTabl(
...     pudl_engine,freq='AS',
...     fill_fuel_cost=True,
...     roll_fuel_cost=True,
...     fill_net_gen=True,
... )
>>> rmi_out = pudl_rmi.coordinate.Output(
...     pudl_out,
... ) 
>>> deprish = rmi_out.grab_deprish()
>>> plants = pudl_out.plants_eia860()
>>> ​
>>> deprish[~deprish.plant_id_eia.isin(plants.plant_id_eia.unique())].plant_id_eia.unique()
<IntegerArray>
[<NA>, 41, 119, 73, 98, 134, 3657, 3660, 3662, 3663, 6, 82, 101, 122, 176, 163, 177, 191, 194, 17633]
Length: 20, dtype: Int64