We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I believe this can be a drop-in replacement for the FFT that is currently being used: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.03932.pdf
More background: http://www.texmacs.org/joris/ffft/ffft.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
~5x faster for 16-bit field, ~3x faster for 8-bit field hypothetically:
affft.test_fft(8) FFT performance for k=8 : 2304 adds, 2304 muladds IFFT performance for k=8 : 2304 adds, 2304 muladds Test successful! Output = Input affft.test_affft2(8) FAFFT2 performance for k=8 : 656 adds, 656 muladds IFAFFT2 performance for k=8 : 176 adds, 656 muladds Test successful! Output = Input
affft.test_affft2(16) FAFFT2 performance for k=16 : 198656 adds, 198656 muladds IFAFFT2 performance for k=16 : 71680 adds, 198656 muladds Test successful! Output = Input affft.test_fft(16) FFT performance for k=16 : 1114112 adds, 1114112 muladds IFFT performance for k=16 : 1114112 adds, 1114112 muladds Test successful! Output = Input
Sorry, something went wrong.
Is the code for this somewhere I can test? :p
Maybe one day :)
No branches or pull requests
I believe this can be a drop-in replacement for the FFT that is currently being used:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.03932.pdf
More background:
http://www.texmacs.org/joris/ffft/ffft.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: