You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is somewhat difficult and is outside the current provided infrastructure because it requires one to do some checks first to see if this looks like something that should be split out. For example "Simon & Garfunkel" should stay the same, but this should not as "Die Lit" is already attributed to the primary artist:
Artist: Playboi Carti & Nicki Minaj
Album: Die Lit
Track: Poke It Out
should become
Artist: Playboi Carti
Album: Die Lit
Track: Poke It Out (feat. Nicki Minaj)
...because "Die Lit" being in both shows this is really just a feat tag.
Possible other things to look for:
&
and
feat[uring]
vs
with
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Came here to ask for an option to put featuring artists in the artist field but what are your thoughts on using multiple tags? id3v2.4 supports having them with a null separated list.
That's a valid concern, there is probably a lot of software that only deals with one field to be honest. I had to look up what audioscrobbler is but it looks like it doesn't support multiple fields. Bit of a shame.
Thoughts on adding this feature behind a flag as a "future" feature that'll become more useful over time (🤞) ?
This is somewhat difficult and is outside the current provided infrastructure because it requires one to do some checks first to see if this looks like something that should be split out. For example "Simon & Garfunkel" should stay the same, but this should not as "Die Lit" is already attributed to the primary artist:
should become
...because "Die Lit" being in both shows this is really just a feat tag.
Possible other things to look for:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: